The National Pension System (NPS) and the Old Pension Scheme (OPS) are both retirement benefit schemes available to Indian government employees, but they have significant differences in terms of structure, benefits, and implementation. Let's break down the differences between NPS and OPS to understand which is more beneficial for an employee, especially from a long-term financial planning perspective.
1. Nature of the Scheme
NPS (National Pension System):
Contributory: NPS is a defined contribution pension scheme. Both the employee and the employer contribute towards the employee’s pension fund. The contributions are invested in market-linked assets (such as equity, government securities, corporate bonds), and the returns depend on the performance of these investments.
Voluntary Participation: Though NPS is mandatory for new government employees, participation is voluntary for the private sector.
OPS (Old Pension Scheme):
Non-Contributory: OPS was a defined benefit pension scheme where employees did not contribute. Instead, the government used to provide a pension based on the employee’s last drawn salary. The pension was typically a percentage of the final salary (usually 50%).
Mandatory Participation: Under OPS, pension was automatically provided to government employees upon retirement, without any personal contributions to the scheme.
2. Pension Structure
NPS:
Market-Linked: The pension in NPS is dependent on the returns generated from the investments made by the pension fund managers. The individual’s accumulated corpus at the time of retirement is used to purchase an annuity that provides a monthly pension.
Withdrawal Flexibility: At retirement, 60% of the corpus can be withdrawn as a lump sum (tax-free), and the remaining 40% must be used to buy an annuity, which provides a monthly pension.
OPS:
Fixed Pension: OPS provided a defined benefit based on the employee's last drawn salary. For example, if an employee’s last drawn salary was ₹50,000, the pension would be 50% of that salary (₹25,000). The pension was fixed and did not depend on market performance or investment returns.
No Lump-Sum Withdrawal: Under OPS, pensioners did not have the option to withdraw a lump sum. The government continued to pay the pension regularly, based on the fixed percentage of the last salary.
3. Contribution and Funding
NPS:
Employee and Employer Contributions: NPS is funded by both the employee and the employer. The government contributes 14% of the basic salary and dearness allowance (DA), while the employee contributes at least 10%. In the private sector, employees can choose the contribution amount, subject to a minimum.
Portability: NPS is portable, meaning employees can continue their NPS contributions even after switching jobs (government or private sector).
OPS:
Government Funding: OPS did not require contributions from employees. The government paid the pension directly from its revenue. Employees did not contribute to a pension fund, and thus, there was no investment mechanism or corpus built over time.
Non-Portability: OPS was applicable only to government employees, and if they left government service or switched to another job, they would not be able to carry forward their pension rights.
4. Return on Investment
NPS:
Market-Linked Returns: The returns on NPS are dependent on the market performance of the funds you invest in. NPS offers multiple asset classes (equity, government securities, corporate bonds), and the returns can vary. Typically, the return on NPS investments is around 8%-10% per annum, but it can fluctuate based on market conditions.
Risk: Since the returns are market-driven, there is an element of market risk involved, particularly for the equity portion of the NPS.
OPS:
Fixed Pension: In OPS, the pension was not linked to market performance but was instead a fixed percentage of the employee’s last salary. There were no returns or market risks associated with OPS.
No Investment Risk: OPS offered no investment risk because the government was responsible for paying the pension directly.
5. Pension Amount and Inflation Adjustment
NPS:
Annuity Purchase: The pension amount under NPS is based on the corpus accumulated at retirement and the annuity rates offered by insurance companies. Annuity rates can vary, and therefore, the monthly pension amount can differ.
Inflation Impact: The pension amount from NPS may not be fully inflation-adjusted, depending on the annuity chosen. While the corpus can grow based on market returns, the pension from annuities may lose value over time due to inflation.
OPS:
Fixed Amount: The pension under OPS was a fixed percentage of the last salary drawn, usually 50%. However, this amount remained static throughout the employee’s life unless the government made an ad-hoc revision.
Inflation Adjustments: Although the government sometimes revised pensions, it was done at its discretion. As a result, OPS pensions were not consistently adjusted for inflation.
6. Tax Treatment
NPS:
Tax Benefits: NPS offers tax deductions under Section 80C (up to ₹1.5 lakh) and an additional ₹50,000 under Section 80CCD(1B). The tax-free withdrawal on 60% of the corpus at retirement is another advantage.
Taxation on Annuity: The annuity portion of the pension (40% of the corpus) is subject to income tax as per the individual’s tax bracket.
OPS:
Tax Treatment: Pensions under OPS were taxable as income. However, there were no tax benefits during the accumulation phase since employees did not contribute to a pension fund.
No Additional Tax Benefits: There were no specific tax deductions available for employees under OPS, unlike NPS.
7. Eligibility
NPS:
All Employees: NPS is available to all Indian citizens, including government employees (both central and state) and private sector employees. It’s mandatory for new central government employees but optional for others.
Private Sector: Employees in the private sector can also voluntarily join NPS.
OPS:
Government Employees: OPS was a scheme only for government employees. It applied to employees who were hired before 2004. New recruits are now automatically enrolled in NPS.
8. Sustainability and Fiscal Pressure
NPS:
Sustainable: NPS is more fiscally sustainable as it is a contributory scheme. Both employees and employers contribute towards the fund, reducing the burden on government finances.
Defined Contribution: The pension amount depends on how much is contributed and the returns earned, making the scheme less likely to cause fiscal stress for the government.
OPS:
Unsustainable: OPS has been criticized for being financially unsustainable in the long term. Since it was a non-contributory system with no corpus accumulation, it put immense pressure on the government’s budget to provide pensions to a growing number of retirees.
Liability: OPS is essentially a defined benefit scheme that created a significant liability for the government, leading to the shift towards NPS.
9. Future Prospects
NPS:
Evolving: NPS is a modern, evolving system. It allows employees to manage their investment strategy and choose their risk levels. The system is likely to continue growing and evolving with increased portability, greater flexibility, and better returns.
Government Transition: The government has phased out OPS for new recruits and replaced it with NPS. Therefore, it is expected to remain the default pension system for government employees.
OPS:
Obsolete: OPS has been discontinued for new recruits since 2004. It continues for those who were already enrolled under the scheme, but it is unlikely to be revived in the future due to its financial constraints.
Government Transition: Over time, many state governments and the central government have moved to NPS, gradually phasing out OPS.
Conclusion: NPS vs OPS
NPS is a more sustainable, modern, and flexible system that offers better financial planning options, market-linked returns, and tax benefits. It's designed to be fiscally responsible for the government while allowing employees to benefit from growing wealth over time. It’s the preferred choice for new government recruits and is also open to private-sector employees.
OPS, while offering guaranteed pension payments based on the last salary drawn, is unsustainable in the long term and has been replaced by NPS for new recruits. It still benefits those who were under OPS before 2004 but lacks the growth potential and flexibility offered by NPS.
If you are a new government employee, you will be automatically enrolled in NPS, and if you are considering a career in the private sector, NPS also offers better retirement security compared to traditional schemes like OPS. For old pensioners
Comments